Statistical Analysis of Socio-Economic Factors as Predictors of Performance in a Brazilian Science Fair

Autores

  • Daniel Verdi do Amarante University of Richmond; Instituto Brasileiro de Jovens Cientistas
  • Kritim Rijal University of Richmond; Instituto Brasileiro de Jovens Cientistas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18264/repdcec.v3i1.138

Palavras-chave:

Equity, Awarding, Access to Resources

Resumo

Science fairs provide an opportunity for students to showcase their scientific endeavours and practice important skills. Additionally, judging and awarding are very important parts of the process, providing feedback and recognition to participants. To maintain fairness in the competition and avoid reinforcing systemic inequalities, it’s crucial to examine the current landscape of science fairs and identify potential areas for improvement. We explore this issue by analyzing the impact of socio-economic factors on students' performance in the Brazilian Fair of Young Scientists. Focusing on gender, race, English level, school type, and location, we use linear and logistic regression models to predict students’ scores and awards. The results suggest that school type and English level, features associated with access to resources, significantly influence success in the competition. Notably, the only criterion that did not show a significant difference in scores for these features was the one about the project idea, indicating that innovative research questions from underserved students may have been hindered by a lack of resources for project development. By addressing these disparities, science fair organizers and policymakers can foster more equitable opportunities and encourage the next generation of scientists, regardless of their background.

Referências

ABERNATHY, T. V.; VINEYARD, R. N. Academic competitions in science: What are the rewards for students? The Clearing House, v. 74, n. 5, p. 269-276, 2001.

ADAMS, D. Science Fair “Fairness”. 2011. Thesis (Master of Statistics) - Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2011. Disponível em: https://mstat.utah.edu/_resources/documents/science-fair-fairness.pdf. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2023.

BELLIPANNI, L. J. The science fair experience: profile of science fair winners. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Dec. 1994. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/id=ED395793. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2023.

CARMICHAEL, H.; MOORE, A.; STEWARD, L.; VELOPULOS, C. G. Using the social vulnerability index to examine local disparities in emergent and elective cholecystectomy. Journal of Surgical Research, v. 243, p. 160-164, 2019.

CZERNIAK, C. M. Predictors of success in a district science fair competition: an exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, v. 96, n. 1, p. 21-27, 1996. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10208.x. Acesso em: 19 out. 2022.

DA SILVA GALLON, M.; ZOTTI DA SILVA, J.; SOUSA DO NASCIMENTO, S.; DA ROCHA FILHO, J. B. Feiras de ciências: uma possibilidade à divulgação e comunicação científica no contexto da educação básica. Revista Insignare Scientia, v. 2, n. 4, p. 180-197, 2019.

FEKETE, A. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, v. 9, n. 2, p. 393-403, 2009. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-393-2009. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2020.

GIFFORD, V. D.; WIYGUL, S. M. The effect of the use of outside facilities and resources on success in secondary school science fairs. School Science and Mathematics, v. 92, n. 3, p. 116, 1992.

IBGE. Características gerais dos domicílios e dos moradores: 2019. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2020. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101707. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

IBGE. IBGE divulga o rendimento domiciliar per capita 2021. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2021. Disponível em: https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Trabalho_e_Rendimento/Pesquisa_Nacional_por_Amostra_de_Domicilios_continua/Renda_domiciliar_per_capita/Renda_domiciliar_per_capita_2021.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

IMPA. Regulamento da 17a Olimpíada Brasileira de Matemática das Escolas Públicas – OBMEP. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.obmep.org.br/docs/2022/regulamento.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

INEP. Notas estatísticas: censo escolar 2018. Brasília, DF: Inep; MEC, 2019. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_basica/censo_escolar/notas_estatisticas/2018/notas_estatisticas_censo_escolar_2018.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

INEP. Censo da educação básica 2019: notas estatísticas. Brasília, DF: Inep; MEC, 2020. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/estatisticas_e_indicadores/notas_estatisticas_censo_da_educacao_basica_2019.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

INEP. Censo da educação básica 2021: notas estatísticas. Brasília, DF: Inep; MEC, 2022. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/estatisticas_e_indicadores/notas_estatisticas_censo_escolar_2021.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

IPEA. Atlas da vulnerabilidade social. On-line: Ipea, 2019. Disponível em: https://dados.gov.br/dados/conjuntos-dados/ivs. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

JARETA, G. Por que o ensino do inglês não decola no Brasil. Educação, on-line, 4 nov. 2015. Disponível em: https://revistaeducacao.com.br/2015/11/04/por-que-o-ensino-do-ingles-nao-decola-no-brasil/. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

KIDDELL, R. B. Science fair project adjudication: a study of 3 judges. 1987. Thesis (Master of Arts) - Department of Science Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1987.

LEVIN, K. N.; LEVIN, R. E. How to judge a science fair: use the consensus method. The Science Teacher, v. 58, p. 43-45, 1991.

MAGALHÃES, D. C.; MASSARANI, L.; ROCHA, J. N. Memórias das feiras de ciências: entrevistas com participantes das feiras estudantis de ciências das décadas de 1960 E 1970 em São Paulo. Linguagens, Educação e Sociedade, v. 26, n. 51, p. 234-267, 2022.

MARTINIANO, M. O ensino do Inglês no Brasil e o problema das escolas públicas. 2 Jul. 2021. Blog Flexge. Disponível em: https://blog.flexge.com/ensino-ingles-brasil-escolas/. Acesso em: 29 maio 2024.

MCDONNELL, A. M. Gender and ethnic preferences in selection of science fair topics. 1996. Thesis (Master of Science) - College of Arts and Sciences, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, 1996.

NASSIF-PIRES, L.; CARVALHO, L. B. D.; LEDERMAN RAWET, E. Multi-dimensional inequality and Covid-19 in Brazil. Investigación económica, v. 80, p. 33-58, 2021.

NOORDERHAVEN, N.; THURIK, R.; WENNEKERS, S.; STEL, V. The role of dissatisfaction and per capita income in explaining self–employment across 15 European countries. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 28, p. 447-466, 2004.

POSEL, D.; ROGAN, M. Women, income and poverty: gendered access to resources in post-apartheid South Africa. Agenda, v. 23, p. 25-34, 2009.

SCHMIDT, K. M.; KELTER, P. Science fairs: a qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, vol. 25, p. 126–132, 2017.

SAB (SOCIEDADE ASTRONÔMICA BRASILEIRA). Regulamento da 25a Olimpíada Brasileira de Astronomia e Astronáutica - OBA. oba.org.br, 2022.

SONNERT, G.; SADLER, P.; MICHAELS, M. Gender aspects of participation, support, and success in a state science fair. School Science and Mathematics, v. 113, p. 135-143, 2013.

SPAUTZ, D. Escolas federais custam menos que as militares e têm desempenho superior no Enem. NSC Total, on-line, 8 jan. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.nsctotal.com.br/colunistas/dagmara-spautz/escolas-federais-custam-menos-que-as-militares-e-tem-desempenho--superior. Acesso em: 22 maio 2024.

STEEGH, A. M.; HÖFFLER, T. N.; KELLER, M. M.; PARCHMANN, I. Gender differences in mathematics and science competitions: a systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 56, p. 1431-1460, 2019.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-07-31

Edição

Seção

Dossiê Feiras de Ciências